Dec. 19th, 2003

evile: (clutter)

    Dec. 19, 2003

     

     

    Actually, I think my opponent thinks she's armed, but is actually
    carrying a styrofoam model rather than an actual weapon. Ah well.

    someone on the livejournal 'childfree' community
    posted this article:

    http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/scitech/SciTechRepublish_898675.htm

    Gee, do you think that's why whatsisname had to quit
    Mensa? had babies and lost IQ points?

    I'm having a stupid flame-ish thing on the LJ CF group
    comments on this article, someone thinks I'm a "raving
    hardcore feminist" because of my comments on the
    article, and refuted my ire with a *hypothetical*
    situation, that *if true*, would make me look like an
    idiot. *laughing* And then typoed as s/he was mocking
    my spelling of 'wimmin', which I did for effect in my
    comment, not because that's how I really spell it.
    Sarcasm is so wasted on people like that.

    http://www.livejournal.com/community/childfree/2142351.html



    The post that started it:

    thespookymod
    Umm... did you even read the article -- or read past the subject
    header to the post?

    ===

    Re: Why is this news?
    bramblekite
    2003-12-19 12:12 (link)
    Indeed I did. And apparently, if you read the article hard enough,
    the reason certain men are geniuses is because of their high levels
    of testosterone. Which leaves us little wimmin out of it altogether.
    This article offends on so many levels, I just picked the first one
    that jumped out at me.

    I am wondering if there was some kind of 'control' group that didn't
    get married/spawn. If Genius and Testosterone are as linked as the
    article posits, then "losing ones genius" should just be a symptom of
    aging rather than a settling-down thing.

    (I am going to have some serious fucking nightmares about your icon,
    btw.)
    (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)
    ====
    Re: Why is this news?
    thespookymod
    2003-12-19 12:24 (link)
    What's so offensive about the idea of a link between genius and
    testosterone?

    Think about it:

    hypothetical/

    Women who are of genius-level intelligence are less prone to the
    desire to bare children. There is a link between dominant levels of
    estrogen and the desire to bare children. It is discovered that women
    who don't desire children, regardless of intelligence, also have more
    dominant levels of testosterone than women who do desire children.
    Coincidentally, there are more genius-level women with dominant
    levels of testosterone.

    /hypothetical

    In the even that this may be proven fact, you'll look like an idiot
    with your feminazi jargon.

    While i'm at it, I think thee's a link between hardcore-feminism and
    idiocy. Case in point, most hardcore feminists forget how to spell as
    soon as the disease affects their brains.
    (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

    Re: Why is this news?
    bramblekite
    2003-12-19 12:30 (link)
    you think "thee's a link," eh?

    heh.

    I like you. You so funny.
    (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

    Dance for me, my puppet!
    thespookymod
    2003-12-19 13:18 (link)
    you think "thee's a link," eh?

    heh.

    I like you. You so funny.

    TRANSLATION:

    You dared me to think?

    damn...

    I'm stuck on trying to make a retort. I think i'll try to be
    condescending and hope it makes me look smrt. oops, forgot to spell-
    check. fuck it, nobody's going to notice.

Profile

evile: (Default)
evile

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4 567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 06:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios