Apr. 21st, 2003

evile: (clutter)

    Apr. 21, 2003

    http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=15673

    Countering a Wave of Hate
    By Tim Robbins
    April 17, 2003
    Transcript of the speech given by actor Tim Robbins to the National
    Press Club in Washington, D.C., on April 15, 2003.

    I had originally been asked here to talk about the war and our
    current political situation but I have instead chosen to hijack this
    opportunity and talk about baseball and show business. Just kidding.
    Sort of.

    I can't tell you how moved I have been at the overwhelming support I
    have received from newspapers throughout the country these past few
    days. I hold no illusions that all of these journalists agree with me
    on my views against the war. While the journalist's outrage at the
    cancellation of our appearance in Cooperstown is not about my views;
    it is about my right to express these views. I am extremely grateful
    that there are those of you out there still with a fierce belief in
    constitutionally guaranteed rights. We need you the press, now more
    than ever. This is a crucial moment for all of us.

    For all the ugliness and tragedy of 9-11 there was a brief period
    afterwards where I held a great hope. In the midst of the tears and
    shocked faces of New Yorkers, in the midst of the lethal air we
    breathed as we worked at Ground Zero, in the midst of my children's
    terror at being so close to this crime against humanity, in the midst
    of all of this I held onto a glimmer of hope in the naive assumption
    that something good could come out of all this. I imagined our
    leaders seizing upon this moment of unity in America, this moment
    when no one wanted to talk about Democrat vs. Republican, white vs.
    black or any of the other ridiculous divisions that dominate our
    public discourse.

    I imagined our leaders going on television, telling the citizens that
    although we all want to be at Ground Zero we can't. But there is work
    that is needed to be done all over America. Our help is needed at
    community centers, to tutor children, to teach them to read, our work
    is needed at old age homes to visit the lonely and infirmed, in
    gutted neighborhoods to rebuild housing and clean up parks, and
    convert abandoned lots into baseball fields.

    I imagined leadership that would take this incredible energy, this
    generosity of spirit, and create a new unity in America born out of
    the chaos and tragedy of 9-11. A new unity that would send a message
    to terrorists everywhere: If you attack us we will become stronger,
    cleaner, better educated, more unified. You will strengthen our
    commitment to justice and democracy by your inhumane attacks on us.
    Like a phoenix out of the fire we will be re-born.

    And then came the speech. "You are either with us or against us" And
    the bombing began. And the old paradigm was restored as our leader
    encouraged us to show our patriotism by shopping and by volunteering
    to join groups that would turn in their neighbor for any suspicious
    behavior.

    In the 19 months since 9-11 we have seen our democracy compromised by
    fear and hatred. Basic inalienable rights, due process, the sanctity
    of the home have been quickly compromised in a climate of fear. A
    unified American public has grown bitterly divided and a world
    population that had profound sympathy and support for us has grown
    contemptuous and distrustful, viewing us as we once viewed the Soviet
    Union, as a rogue state.

    This past weekend Susan and I and the three kids went to Florida for
    a family re-union of sorts. Amidst the alcohol and the dancing and
    the sugar-rushing children there was, of course talk of the war. The
    most frightening thing about the weekend was the amount of times we
    were thanked for speaking out against the war because that individual
    speaking thought it unsafe to do so in their own community in their
    own life. "Keep talking. I haven't been able to open my mouth."
    A relative tells me that a history teacher tells his 11-year-old son,
    my nephew, that Susan Sarandon is endangering the troops by her
    opposition to the war. Another teacher in a different school asks our
    niece if we were coming to the school play. "They're not welcome
    here," said the molder of young minds.

    Another relative tells me of a school board decision to cancel a
    civics event that was proposing to have a moment of silence for those
    who have died in the war because the students were including dead
    Iraqi civilians in their silent prayer. A teacher in another nephew's
    school is fired for wearing a t-shirt with a peace sign on it. And a
    friend of the family tells of listening to the radio down south as
    the talk radio host calls for the murder of a prominent anti-war
    activist.

    Death threats have appeared on other prominent peaceniks doorsteps
    for their views against the war. Realtives of ours have received
    threatening e-mails and phone calls. My 13-year-old boy, who has done
    nothing to anybody, has been embarrassed and humiliated by a sadistic
    creep who writes, or rather, scratches, his column with his fingers
    in the dirt.

    Susan and I have been listed as traitors, as supporters of Saddam,
    and various other epithets by the Aussie gossip rags masquerading as
    newspapers and by their "fair and balanced" electronic media cousins,
    19th Century Fox. Apologies to Gore Vidal. Two weeks ago, the United
    Way cancelled Susan's appearance at a conference on women's
    leadership and both of us last week were told that both we and the
    1st Amendment were not welcome at the Baseball Hall of Fame.

    A famous rock and roller called me last week to thank me for speaking
    out against the war only to go on to tell me that he could not speak
    himself because he fears repercussions from Clear Channel. "They
    promote our concert appearances," he said. "They own most of the
    stations that play our music. I can't come out against this war." And
    here in Washington, [veteran White House correspondent] Helen Thomas
    finds herself banished to the back of the room and uncalled on after
    asking Ari Fleisher whether our showing prisoners of war at
    Guantanamo Bay on television violated the Geneva Convention.

    A chill wind is blowing in this nation. A message is being sent
    through the White House and its allies in talk radio and Clear
    Channel and Cooperstown. "If you oppose this administration there can
    and will be ramifications." Every day the airwaves are filled with
    warnings, veiled and unveiled threats, spewed invective and hatred
    directed at any voice of dissent. And the public, like so many
    relatives and friends that I saw this weekend, sit in mute opposition
    and in fear.

    I'm sick of hearing about Hollywood being against the war.
    Hollywood's heavy hitters, the real power brokers and cover of the
    magazine stars have been largely silent on this issue. But Hollywood,
    the concept, has always been a popular target.

    I remember when the Columbine high school shootings happened,
    President Clinton criticized Hollywood for contributing to this
    terrible tragedy. This as we were dropping bombs over Kosovo. Could
    the violent actions of our leaders contribute somewhat to the violent
    fantasies our teenagers are having? Or is it all just Hollywood and
    rock and roll?

    I remember reading at the time that one of the shooters had tried to
    enlist to fight the real war a week before he acted out his war in
    real life at Columbine. I talked about this in the press at the time
    and curiously no one accused me of being unpatriotic for criticizing
    Clinton. In fact, the same talk-radio patriots that call us traitors
    today engaged in daily personal attacks on their president during the
    war in Kosovo.

    Today, prominent politicians who have decried violence in movies,
    (the blame-Hollywooders if you will), recently voted to give our
    current president the power to unleash real violence in our current
    war. They want us to stop the fictional violence but are OK with the
    real kind. And these same people that tolerate the real violence of
    war don't want to see the result of it on the nightly news. Unlike
    the rest of the world, our news coverage of this war remains
    sanitized, without a glimpse of the blood and gore inflicted upon our
    soldiers or the women and children in Iraq. Violence as a concept, an
    abstraction.

    It's very strange. As we applaud the hard-edged realism of the
    opening battle scene of Saving Private Ryan, we cringe at the thought
    of seeing the same on the nightly news. We are told it would be
    pornographic. We want no part of reality in real life. We demand that
    war be painstakingly realized on the screen but that war remain
    imagined and conceptualized in real life.

    And in the midst of all this madness, where is the political
    opposition? Where have all the Democrats gone? Long time passing,
    long time ago? With apologies to Robert Byrd, I have to say it is
    pretty embarrassing to live in a country where a five-foot-one
    comedian has more guts than most politicians. We need leaders, not
    pragmatists that cower before the spin zones of former entertainment
    journalists. We need leaders who understand the Constitution –
    Congressmen who don't, in a moment of fear, abdicate their most
    important power, the right to declare war, to the executive branch.
    And please, can we stop the Congressional sing-a-longs?

    In this time when a citizenry applauds the liberation of a country as
    it lives in fear of its own freedom, when an administration official
    releases an attack ad questioning the patriotism of a legless Vietnam
    veteran running for Congress, when people all over the country fear
    reprisal if they use their right to free speech, it is time to get
    angry. It is time to get fierce. It doesn't take much to shift the
    tide. My 11-year-old nephew, mentioned earlier, a shy kid who never
    talks in class, stood up to his history teacher who was questioning
    Susan's patriotism.

    "That's my aunt you're talking about. Stop it!" and the stunned
    teacher backtracked and began stammering compliments in
    embarrassment.

    Sports writers across the country reacted with such overwhelming fury
    at the Hall of Fame that the president of the Hall admitted he made a
    mistake and Major League Baseball disavowed any connection to the
    actions of the Hall's president. A bully can be stopped. So can a
    mob. It takes one person with the courage and a resolute voice. The
    journalists in this country can battle back at those who would re-
    write our Constitution in the PATRIOT Act II or Patriot, the sequel,
    as we would call it in Hollywood. We are counting on you to star in
    that movie.

    Journalists can insist that they not be used as publicists by this
    administration. The next White House correspondent to be called on by
    Ari Fleischer should defer their question to the back of the room to
    the banished journalist de jour. Any instance of intimidation to free
    speech should be battled against. Any acquiescence to intimidation at
    this point will only lead to more intimidation. You have, whether you
    like it or not, an awesome responsibility and an awesome power. The
    fate of discourse, the health of this republic is in your hands,
    whether you write on the left or the right.

    This is your time and the destiny you have chosen. We lay the
    continuance of our democracy on your desks and count on your pens to
    be mightier. Millions are watching and waiting in mute frustration
    and hope. Hoping for someone to defend the spirit and letter of our
    Constitution and to defy the intimidation that is visited upon us
    daily in the name of national security and warped notions of
    patriotism.

    Our ability to disagree, and our inherent right to question our
    leaders and criticize their actions define who we are. To allow those
    rights to be taken away out of fear, to punish people for their
    beliefs, to limit access in the news media to differing opinions is
    to acknowledge our democracy's defeat.

    These are challenging times. There is a wave of hate that seeks to
    divide us, right and left, pro-war and anti-war. In the name of my 11-
    year-old nephew and all the other unreported victims of this hostile
    and unproductive environment of fear, let us try to find our common
    ground. Let us celebrate this grand and glorious experiment that has
    survived for 227 years. To do so we must honor and fight vigilantly
    for the things that unite us. Like freedom, the first amendment and,
    yes, baseball.

Profile

evile: (Default)
evile

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4 567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 07:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios