1367stupid stirring

 

1367 stupid stirring

 

 

Apr. 16, 2003

 

 

--- kaleon p wrote:
From: "kaleon 
To:
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 23:49:07 +0800
Subject: Re: Another Gothfest this weekend

Thank you hon

I think I may not have gotten one of the emails
you sent me. I was told you sent me a long email
explaining why you were upset with me, I never got
that. I still do not understand why you are upset
with me, considering what all happened. If you
email that to me again, I know you save your outgoing
mail, I would appreciate it, so I can answer
whatever it is you percieve that I need to answer
for. Thank you.

kaleon
========================
me to J-Law:

Got a really wierdo email from skye's kaleon. I will feel
hypocritical & bad if I give him the silent treatment,
but I am so fuckin' *done* with that kid. I'll send it
to you.

--

E wrote:Background: I cut & pasted the info from
nephilim network & emailed it to him & a few other folks I
thought might like to go. No commentary, just info.

From the sound of it ("I was told"-blabla), it looks
like UB/Sineater read the last email I sent & then
accidentally deleted it, but somehow managed to tell
kaleon about it without implicating themselves as
snoopers. Such a sick fuckin' game. And I have to
pretend I don't know anything about it, or risk
getting barred from Sineater again.

At this point, I'm pretty well convinced she read
his emails without him sending them to her, ie: his
email account was hacked. But the point at which we could
have talked this thru is long past. The fact that he
preferred to have pointless drama & believe the
worst of me rather than just fricken talking to me pretty
much says it all.

=E
===========
--- J-Law wrote:
Whatever, dude. If you're done, there's no point in
re-sending your email. You could say nothing, or,
you could reply and say either that you didn't save
that message, or, that, at this point there is
nothing to resolve, etc. etc. The tone of his
message, e.g., whatever it is you perceive, and
similar, suggests that he has no interest/intention
of actually working things out, that he doesn't
believe that he could have possibly done anything
wrong, or whatever. Maybe he is just collecting
ammo. Regardless.... stay away. Ignoring it
wouldn't necessarily be hypocritical or skye-esque
because getting sucked into his (and, by extention,
skye's) drama tornado would be very harmful to you.
You aren't "giving him the silent treatment" as some
kind of drama-creating tactic. You are protecting
yourself. However, if you feel that you must
respond, respond with some kind of polite brush off
thing. BUT, if you do that, it will more than
likely be misconstrued and shared with others.

============================

Me to J-Law:

Probably will be interpret-able as 'stirring' but what the hell. Here
is what I sent him:
===============
(me to J)
I don't know who is telling you what, or why, but there was no
final 'long email'. We talked on ICQ and that was the end of it.

I don't hate you. I'm not mad at you. I'm just *done*.

Good luck with your life & I hope you find more healthy ways to feel
good about yourself.

•  

•