Word.

[evile]

"Hint: You cannot accuse the person whose mailbox you hacked into of moral corruption when you find something incriminating because you are morally corrupt.

This message is lovingly dedicated to two cunnies."

--metamistress

When reading this, I thought of an in-law and also "anonymous".

Comments

[interactiveleaf.livejournal.com]

Sure you can. Just because the source is bad doesn't make the information, or the judgment, inaccurate.

I thought of Sarah Palin, myself.

[bramblekite.livejournal.com]

well, OK, maybe you *can*...but you really can't claim any moral high ground.

I hate hypocrites more than just about anything. Just a pet peeve of mine. Apparently most people dont' really care about the disconnect between what people say and what they do, and various filthy people finger pointing at one another from different holes in the mud. I just find that sort of thing rather contemptible.

[interactiveleaf.livejournal.com]

Apparently most people dont' really care about the disconnect between what people say and what they do

If people paid attention to things like that, our crop of politicians would be a much different group than it is.

[thax.livejournal.com]

Now wait a minute. You can't claim the high ground after digging trash out of a hacked e-mail, but you can give the trash to the media and they can claim all the high ground they want?

Because apparently that's the case. And its really confusing.

Anonymous says don't put your secrets on the internet...
...sucka

[mrhuggles.livejournal.com]

That deserves more facepalms than I can muster.

I always used to worry that my ex would actually try to do that to me.

[bramblekite.livejournal.com]

My ex is an IT professional, he could fuck me up if he wanted to. As each day goes by, I find myself more and more grateful for his complete indifference.

[bramblekite.livejournal.com]

isn't that odd?

legally, stuff is inadmissble if it's found that way, but as far as the news networks go, they didn't do the garbage-digging, but if it gets ratings, they'll show it. In fact, they are almost OBLIGATED by their JOURNALISTIC INTEGRITY to give the readers/viewers this information, no matter how illegally it was obtained. Crazy.

[bramblekite.livejournal.com]

*sigh*

it's almost like ADD was a government conspiracy to make sure we don't retain what we hear or read from day to day and call people on their shit.

Hm.

Tinfoil hat time.